Impact of COVID-19 on emergency department use among home care recipients

BACKGROUND: The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on Emergency Department (ED) was remarkable throughout Europe. We focused upon ED utilization among integrated home care (IHC) recipients comparing ED between pandemic period with pre-pandemic (February -December 2020 and 2019, respectively) in Piedmont, Italy. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted. All recipients of IHC during the two periods studied were enrolled and all ED visits that occurred among IHC recipients were accounted for. Several variables related to IHC admission, reason of ED visits and demographic characteristics were collected. The average of ED visits in pre-pandemic and pandemic periods were calculated. Analyses were stratified by all variables. RESULTS: Patients enrolled were 11968 in 2019 and 8938 in 2020. In 2019, 3573 patients had at least one ED visit and 1668 patients in 2020. Number of ED visits was 5503 in 2019 and 2197 in 2020. The average of ED visits in 2020 has reduced in comparison with 2019 (0.464 C.I. [0.44-0.489] and 0.24 C.I. [0.227-0.252], p < 0.001 in 2019 and 2020 respectively). This reduction is regardless of sex, age, duration of IHC, presence of a non-family caregiver or reason for ED visits, except for abdominal pain, cardiac rhythm alteration and gynaecological symptoms. The averages of ED visits were significantly lower for IHC recipients with neoplasm (0.549 C.I. [0.513-0.585] and 0.328 C.I. [0.298-0.358], p < 0.001, and with low level of emergency (1.77 C.I. [1.662-1.877] and 1.397 C.I. [1.348-1.447], p < 0.036), but an increase in mortality rate was not registered. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed a reduction of ED visits among integrated home care recipients in pandemic period in comparison with pre-pandemic period. If the reduction can be the consequence of an unprepared health service that needs of necessary changes in its organization, these results suggest a great potential of the home care system to reduce the use of the hospital especially for low-risk conditions. KEY MESSAGES: • The COVID-19 pandemic overwhelmed health services of all European Countries. A reduced utilization of ED has been shown by literature, especially during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. • We showed a reduction in IHC recipients and a great decrease in ED visits among IHC patients in 2020 versus 2019, mainly in oncological patients, while an increase in mortality rate was not reported

Methodological aspects in valuing loss of production and informal care in cost-of-illness studies

Estimating costs of illness in social terms requires the consideration of the loss of production costs due to absence from work. Costs related to informal care should also be counted. Costs due to the loss of production are valued through the human capital method and the frictional costs method. Opportunity cost and proxy good methods are utilized for the informal care. Our study highlights practical issues about the use of a variety of methods and points out their main limits

Gender health and policies: a review of the state of the art from exposure to solutions.

Objective. To synthesize the determinants of gender inequalities through a narrative review that: (i) describes gender related variables that can create different levels of health; (H) describes key points that may assist in policy development and its reorientation towards gender differences; (Hi) debates potential approaches in understanding gender issues. Methods. Review of the international literature through online databases (Pubmed), search engines, publications and documents from "grey literature". Inclusion criteria: publications from 1997, English language; keywords used: gender based analysis; gender and public policy; women's health; gender differences; health policy; gender impact assessment. Among the 300 papers retrieved, 55 were selected for relevance. Results. We performed a narrative synthesis of the included literature, regarding: (i) gender differences and their determinants; (H) elements for the changing; (Hi) possible approaches; (iv) gender influences the pursuit of health and health care access through specific variables; (v) health policies can modify these variables only by a minimal percentage. These interventions should guarantee equity and allow efficient resources allocation. The gap between political announcements and real policy implementation remains unchanged, (vi) Standard approaches to the topic are not feasible due to the scarcity of a specific literature and the numerous cultural differences. Conclusions. Gender analysis of policies suggests they can differently affect women in comparison to men. However, reforms, strategies and interventions introduced in the last two decades, have achieved a limited success towards better gender equality in health. The main aim is to attack the structural sources of gender inequity in the society